
Many radiologists don’t enjoy interpreting mammograms, but fortunately that doesn’t affect the quality of their work. That’s what a survey of more than 100 radiologists from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium found. The findings appear in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
The survey asked participants to rank their enjoyment of reading mammograms and included questions regarding interpretive accuracy. Results showed that just over half of the participants enjoyed interpreting mammograms. Radiologists who enjoyed it the most tended to be older women who worked part-time. Those who said they did not enjoy the work as much were most likely to be younger men who thought the work was tedious or who felt uncertain about interpreting results.
Happily, attitude did not seem to affect performance. The average abnormal interpretation rate for all radiologists was just over 11 percent for screening mammograms and 8.6 percent for diagnostic mammograms, with a cancer detection rate of 30 per 1,000 diagnostic mammograms.
While the survey focused on overall performance, the findings shed light on which professionals tend to enjoy mammography the most. “With the dearth of breast imagers available, using the data from the survey by individual practices may help to increase overall job satisfaction and therefore aid in recruiting and retaining radiologists willing to interpret mammograms,” said Basil Hubbi, MD, who reviewed the study.
________________
Do you enjoy interpreting mammograms? Tell us what you think.
Read or listen to concise expert reviews of hundreds of current studies. Sign up for a free trial of Practical Reviews in Radiology.
Permalink: http://www.radiologydaily.com/?p=3196
Tags: ALL, AVA, breast cancer, cancer, CT, diagnostic, mammogram, mammograms, mammography, MI, PE, practical reviews in radiology, Practical Reviews In Radiology, qf, rad, radiologist, radiology, reviews, screening
Related
Fatal error: Call to undefined function ck_display_karma() in /home3/oakston1/public_html/radiologydaily/wp-content/themes/oakstone/comments.php on line 36