
Palpable breast tumors that appear benign should have short-term interval follow-up, according to a study recently published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
While previous studies have looked at the outcomes of non-palpable breast masses, little has been known about those that are palpable, leading experts from the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) to recommend against short-term interval follow-up for palpable breast masses.
In this retrospective study, researchers looked at outcome data on 375 palpable breast tumors in 320 women for which follow-up had been recommended. At follow-up (a mean of 2.7 years), 26 lesions, or 6.9 percent, had grown. Twenty-four of the 26 lesions were biopsied, with no cancer. Overall cancer prevalence was similar for palpable and non-palpable masses, and the cost of follow-up was lower than that of biopsy.
The study helps answer the question breast imagers have had for years: “Should palpability continue to be a factor in assessing breast masses?” notes reviewer Basil Hubbi, MD. A new BI-RADS edition, due out this year, should integrate data from this study with others and help minimize unnecessary biopsies, Hubbi adds.
_______________
Learn more aboout the latest in mammogram technology. Register for the Pittsburgh Breast Imaging seminar.
Permalink: http://www.radiologydaily.com/?p=3355
Tags: ALL, biopsy, Breast Imaging, breast masses, cancer, CT, imaging, mammogram, MI, NEC, PE, rad, SPECT, test, tumors
Related
Free Special Reports on leading Radiology topics for you to download now. Plus, get free email newsletters.