Have an account? Please log in.
Text size: Small font Default font Larger font
Radiology Daily
Radiology Daily PracticalReviews.com Radiology Daily

CE and TOF 3T MRA Both Effective at Classifying Patency of GDC-Treated Aneurysms

August 4, 2009
Written by: , Filed in: Neuroradiology
  • Comments

Patients who have undergone treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC) need follow-up studies to confirm long-term occlusion of the aneurysm because coils can change shape or the aneurysm can grow.

CT evaluation is limited by streak artifact and the radiation dose is significant, especially since patients will require multiple follow-up studies.

3D time of flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) have been demonstrated to be reliable in assessing aneurysm patency, particularly on 3T imaging, which has improved signal intensity-to-noise and/or resolution.

A recent study was conducted to determine whether parallel acquisition technique with CE-MRA or 3D-TOF are superior for follow-up of GDC-treated intracranial aneurysms on 3T imaging.

The study has shown that on 3T MRA imaging with parallel acquisition technique, time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MRA are similarly effective at classifying patency of coiled aneurysms, but contrast images better demonstrated the patent portion of the aneurysm in this study.

Patients undergoing scheduled routine follow-up of coiled aneurysms.

Non-contrast 3D-TOF images were acquired with 1 x 1 x1-mm voxel size and reconstructed to 0.5 x 0.5 x 1 mm. Time of acquisition was 5 minutes and 40 seconds. CE-MRA was performed following administration of gadobenate dimeglumine with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg at a rate of 2 mL/second. Imaging time was 24 seconds. Acquisition voxel size was 0.72 x 0.72 x 0.8 mm, reconstructed to 0.43 x 0.43 x 0.4 mm.

Source images as well as various 3D reconstructions were generated. They were evaluated in a randomized order and were classified as occluded or as demonstrating residual patency. If patency was seen, the quality of visualizing the patency was compared.

There were 52 patients with 54 aneurysms. Fifty-three aneurysms were classified equally by both sequences; 21 were occluded, 16 had a residual neck (type I), and 16 were patent (type II).

In 1 giant aneurysm measuring 26 mm, the TOF indicated occlusion, but the CE-MRA demonstrated a residual neck. In addition to this 1 case, the CE-MRA demonstrated the patency better than the TOF in 10 aneurysms with patency.

Eight of these were type II and 2 were type I.

In no case was visualization superior on TOF. In 5 cases on TOF imaging, the parent vessel appeared partially obscured by artifact, but this did not affect evaluation of the vessel.

Neuroradiology Review

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Course Directors: David Yousem, MD, MBA and Doris Lin, MD, PhD Maintaining certification requires not only medical knowledge to deliver quality care but also other essential elements that must be developed and maintained throughout every radiologist’s career. Therefore, this program serves as a comprehensive review of neuro-radiology and prepares the participants to tackle imaging of the brain, spine, head and neck, as well as the vascular anatomy of the central nervous system. Click here to read more or order: Neuroradiology Review

3D-TOF and CE-MRA performed on 3T with parallel imaging technique were similarly effective at classifying patency of GDC-treated aneurysms. However, CE-MRA demonstrated improved visualization of patency and fewer artifacts.

Reviewer’s Comments
Although apparently not statistically significant, the fact that 1 aneurysm was misclassified would suggest that CE-MRA should be preferred.

Where contrast is contraindicated, TOF is nearly as reliable for determining whether the aneurysm is occluded or not.

Regarding patent aneurysms, the authors did not comment as to whether improved visualization was clinically significant.

Author: Yaron Lebovitz, MD

Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, et al. Follow-Up of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography. AJNR; 2008;29 (September): 1530-1536


Permalink: http://www.radiologydaily.com/?p=1863

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Comments

Would you like to keep current with radiological news and information?

Post Your Comments and Responses

Comments are closed.